Feedback removal is a heavy topic there.

The forum has a lot of expert advice on it. http://www.modeeworld.com/forums I found advice there about how to avoid EBAY suspensions, get past PayPal limitations, also lots of detailed help on creating your own business, getting past trademark violations, VERO and lots more. Plus general advice on how best to sell on EBAY, what sells the best, how to get the best price for your product, really everything related to EBAY and internet business.

Also advice about how EBAY really works and how PayPal really works. The inside scoop.

Beautiful forum. I was made a moderator of the forum and I love it!

Richard has an adorable accent and personality. I hear his frustration, but the truth it’s a corporate blog, in which Ebay only whats to portray itself as wonderful and perfect. What a magnificent opportunity, though to work for a major phenomenon like Ebay. Sure, there is the current evil Ebay. They put themselves in that position by making horrendous mistakes and forgetting who pays the bills. But there are so many lessons to learn from Ebay’s downfall. He does well at what he’s expected of him to do. He’s come aboard at a major milestone in Ebay’s history. How enviable and awesome is that!

I’d keep my hears and eyes wide open and keep a secret diary

I love what you do and how you do it.

Below random comments on the interview from a less than excited and less than delighted seller.

“Eloquent in spin”

Hee hee hee….

Richard – Have you considered following around a seller for a day? Not a non-transparent Diamond seller with a staff, a contract and a plenary indulgence but just an ordinary good, honest. long time seller. Maybe one of the ones Ms. Whitman says is making their living on the site.

John – Wish you had asked Richard why posts that were once instantly visible after submission to INK now take DAYS to appear.

How many approvals and how much process are now needed before clearance for an INK posting?

John/Richard

Here’s a thought related to eBay.

Did you know that an eBay seller will receive a “Firearms, Weapons and Knives” Policy Violation for listing a “Daisy Red Ryder” BB gun yet eBay serves up sponsored links to the same item deemed too dangerous to list?

Try it. Search eBay for “Daisy Red Ryder”. Look at the sponsored links at the bottom.

Be warned though that you must never, never, never list one as a seller. That will get you a “Firearms, Weapons and Knives” policy violation and lots of red on your seller dashboard.

Seller Listing Daisy Red Ryder = Policy Violation

Sponsored Link of same = A-OK and All Systems Go

With reference to eBay’s promotion of Richard’s blog;

RBH – “It’s (eBayINK) still not known across the company.”

Colder Ice – “YOUR BLOG!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!”

Amazing.

Ebay so rocks!!!

Usher is on Auction Wally, Griff is on Seller Central and Richard is here. Could it be that things are falling apart and the PR machine has been activated?

Write that book, Richard, write that book. You are present at the destruction. The Harvard Case Study will gin up interest in this excited and delighted catastrophe and your book can only benefit.

Richard – You have to ask John why there are “pitchforks in their (good, honest, long time sellers’) hands”?

Really?

Really!?!?!

FOR THE LOVE OF G-D READ YOUR BLOG COMMENTS!

WAKE UP! It’s in front of your face.

It has been carefully excruciatingly explained to you in the eBayINK blog comments.

WAKE UP!

Go with “Fluff Friday” but PLEASE consider “Honest Other Days” or “Reality Rest of the Days”.

Richard – Sellers don’t want to social network. We just want to sell without fear.

John/Richard

Read then blog then pick up on this -

http://tinyurl.com/czj2bu

The INK blog post titled “Feedback on Feedback on Feedback” was a disappointment. Burke maintained that all this carp about retaliatory feedback, the punishment of ALL sellers had NOTHING to do with any measureable statistics. It was based on a hunch. There was no research done on why a negative feedback was left after receiving a negative feedback. Burke et al assumed that a negative feedback received after a negative feedback was left HAD TO BE, COULD BE NOTHING MORE than “retaliatory”. Burke seemed oblivious to the fact that negs left after receiving negs skyrocketed after eBay introduced Mutual Feedback Removal.

Trash statistics used to punish ALL sellers for the sins of a few with eBay’s approval.

Glad u likey ~ Ennga and Cliff

Nadine ~ I guess we all got to take things we hear with a grain of salt huh?

Richard, thanks for being so open, it speaks well for the company (as well as yourself) that you can be. Basically, in my mind, you are the face of eBay, since, well, you actually show your face and have communicated with me directly

Really love the idea of this being a regular feature, would love to hear you guys chat again.

Thanks,Cliff