<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stupid Is As Stupid Does: Is Rupert Murdoch Stupid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/</link>
	<description>eCommerce business top seller videos from top eBay online commerce seller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ColderICE</title>
		<link>http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-3417</link>
		<dc:creator>ColderICE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/#comment-3417</guid>
		<description>Hello goliathusmam,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your comments. I think the MAJOR point that I am making here&lt;br&gt;is not about Murdoch wanting to monetize his content. That part I have no&lt;br&gt;problem with at all. I do not want anyone to think that is what I am trying&lt;br&gt;to convey.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue is that PEOPLE determine how the content is distributed in the new&lt;br&gt;web world. The PEOPLE want the content available via RSS feeds or&lt;br&gt;in their RSS readers or on their mobile phone. If Murdoch or anyone else who&lt;br&gt;is the owner of content does not wake up to the fact that you must provide&lt;br&gt;it the way the reader wants it, then they might just be in for a rude&lt;br&gt;awakening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The listeners of music wanted MP3&#039;s and the music company wanted to keep us&lt;br&gt;buying CD&#039;s...Who won? The music companies? NOPE...APPLE!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple gave the music listeners what they wanted and monetized it. They then&lt;br&gt;DRAGGED the music labels kicking and screaming to the table. That is how&lt;br&gt;this works. The people got what they wanted and they are willing to pay for&lt;br&gt;it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am in NO WAY advocating that Murdoch or anyone else not be compensated for&lt;br&gt;its content. I am saying that Murdoch had better realize that the people&lt;br&gt;will not continue comming to him on his terms. The times dictact that&lt;br&gt;companies figure out the delivery of content the way the people want it&lt;br&gt;(like Apple did for music, Amazon is doing for books and Google does for&lt;br&gt;searching information) that is where the MONEY will flow going forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;e: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:John@3rdPO.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John@3rdPO.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;store: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3rdPO.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.3rdPO.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;address:  3rd Power &#124; 3550 Centerville Hwy &#124; Suite 107-216 &#124; Snellville, GA&lt;br&gt; 30039&lt;br&gt;fax: 678-805-4900</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello goliathusmam,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments. I think the MAJOR point that I am making here<br />is not about Murdoch wanting to monetize his content. That part I have no<br />problem with at all. I do not want anyone to think that is what I am trying<br />to convey.</p>
<p>The issue is that PEOPLE determine how the content is distributed in the new<br />web world. The PEOPLE want the content available via RSS feeds or<br />in their RSS readers or on their mobile phone. If Murdoch or anyone else who<br />is the owner of content does not wake up to the fact that you must provide<br />it the way the reader wants it, then they might just be in for a rude<br />awakening.</p>
<p>The listeners of music wanted MP3&#39;s and the music company wanted to keep us<br />buying CD&#39;s&#8230;Who won? The music companies? NOPE&#8230;APPLE!!!</p>
<p>Apple gave the music listeners what they wanted and monetized it. They then<br />DRAGGED the music labels kicking and screaming to the table. That is how<br />this works. The people got what they wanted and they are willing to pay for<br />it.</p>
<p>I am in NO WAY advocating that Murdoch or anyone else not be compensated for<br />its content. I am saying that Murdoch had better realize that the people<br />will not continue comming to him on his terms. The times dictact that<br />companies figure out the delivery of content the way the people want it<br />(like Apple did for music, Amazon is doing for books and Google does for<br />searching information) that is where the MONEY will flow going forward.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>John</p>
<p>e: <a href="mailto:John@3rdPO.com" rel="nofollow">John@3rdPO.com</a><br />store: <a href="http://www.3rdPO.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.3rdPO.com</a><br />address:  3rd Power | 3550 Centerville Hwy | Suite 107-216 | Snellville, GA<br /> 30039<br />fax: 678-805-4900</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goliathusmam</title>
		<link>http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>goliathusmam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>y first time when you miss it you really do , he also owns fox channels. he wants to be paid for the use of the rebroadcast of news and entertainment which now gos out for free  by Google .   if Google had to pay for the news and info they use do you think that there would be as much info on Google, Google charges for its finding search , but pays no one for all the info the glean from every else ,  Murdock only wants to get paid for some of the money Google is making of him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>y first time when you miss it you really do , he also owns fox channels. he wants to be paid for the use of the rebroadcast of news and entertainment which now gos out for free  by Google .   if Google had to pay for the news and info they use do you think that there would be as much info on Google, Google charges for its finding search , but pays no one for all the info the glean from every else ,  Murdock only wants to get paid for some of the money Google is making of him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColderICE</title>
		<link>http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>ColderICE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>Hello goliathusmam,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your comments. I think the MAJOR point that I am making here&lt;br&gt;is not about Murdoch wanting to monetize his content. That part I have no&lt;br&gt;problem with at all. I do not want anyone to think that is what I am trying&lt;br&gt;to convey.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue is that PEOPLE determine how the content is distributed in the new&lt;br&gt;web world. The PEOPLE want the content available via RSS feeds or&lt;br&gt;in their RSS readers or on their mobile phone. If Murdoch or anyone else who&lt;br&gt;is the owner of content does not wake up to the fact that you must provide&lt;br&gt;it the way the reader wants it, then they might just be in for a rude&lt;br&gt;awakening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The listeners of music wanted MP3&#039;s and the music company wanted to keep us&lt;br&gt;buying CD&#039;s...Who won? The music companies? NOPE...APPLE!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple gave the music listeners what they wanted and monetized it. They then&lt;br&gt;DRAGGED the music labels kicking and screaming to the table. That is how&lt;br&gt;this works. The people got what they wanted and they are willing to pay for&lt;br&gt;it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am in NO WAY advocating that Murdoch or anyone else not be compensated for&lt;br&gt;its content. I am saying that Murdoch had better realize that the people&lt;br&gt;will not continue comming to him on his terms. The times dictact that&lt;br&gt;companies figure out the delivery of content the way the people want it&lt;br&gt;(like Apple did for music, Amazon is doing for books and Google does for&lt;br&gt;searching information) that is where the MONEY will flow going forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;e: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:John@3rdPO.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John@3rdPO.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;store: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.3rdPO.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.3rdPO.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;address:  3rd Power &#124; 3550 Centerville Hwy &#124; Suite 107-216 &#124; Snellville, GA&lt;br&gt; 30039&lt;br&gt;fax: 678-805-4900</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello goliathusmam,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments. I think the MAJOR point that I am making here<br />is not about Murdoch wanting to monetize his content. That part I have no<br />problem with at all. I do not want anyone to think that is what I am trying<br />to convey.</p>
<p>The issue is that PEOPLE determine how the content is distributed in the new<br />web world. The PEOPLE want the content available via RSS feeds or<br />in their RSS readers or on their mobile phone. If Murdoch or anyone else who<br />is the owner of content does not wake up to the fact that you must provide<br />it the way the reader wants it, then they might just be in for a rude<br />awakening.</p>
<p>The listeners of music wanted MP3&#39;s and the music company wanted to keep us<br />buying CD&#39;s&#8230;Who won? The music companies? NOPE&#8230;APPLE!!!</p>
<p>Apple gave the music listeners what they wanted and monetized it. They then<br />DRAGGED the music labels kicking and screaming to the table. That is how<br />this works. The people got what they wanted and they are willing to pay for<br />it.</p>
<p>I am in NO WAY advocating that Murdoch or anyone else not be compensated for<br />its content. I am saying that Murdoch had better realize that the people<br />will not continue comming to him on his terms. The times dictact that<br />companies figure out the delivery of content the way the people want it<br />(like Apple did for music, Amazon is doing for books and Google does for<br />searching information) that is where the MONEY will flow going forward.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>John</p>
<p>e: <a href="mailto:John@3rdPO.com" rel="nofollow">John@3rdPO.com</a><br />store: <a href="http://www.3rdPO.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.3rdPO.com</a><br />address:  3rd Power | 3550 Centerville Hwy | Suite 107-216 | Snellville, GA<br /> 30039<br />fax: 678-805-4900</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goliathusmam</title>
		<link>http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-2905</link>
		<dc:creator>goliathusmam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/#comment-2905</guid>
		<description>y first time when you miss it you really do , he also owns fox channels. he wants to be paid for the use of the rebroadcast of news and entertainment which now gos out for free  by Google .   if Google had to pay for the news and info they use do you think that there would be as much info on Google, Google charges for its finding search , but pays no one for all the info the glean from every else ,  Murdock only wants to get paid for some of the money Google is making of him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>y first time when you miss it you really do , he also owns fox channels. he wants to be paid for the use of the rebroadcast of news and entertainment which now gos out for free  by Google .   if Google had to pay for the news and info they use do you think that there would be as much info on Google, Google charges for its finding search , but pays no one for all the info the glean from every else ,  Murdock only wants to get paid for some of the money Google is making of him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupid Is As Stupid Does: Is Rupert Murdoch Stupid? - News: Everything-e</title>
		<link>http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-2897</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupid Is As Stupid Does: Is Rupert Murdoch Stupid? - News: Everything-e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3rdpoblogs.com/colderice/2009/11/13/stupid-is-as-stupid-does-is-rupert-murdoch-stupid/#comment-2897</guid>
		<description>[...] point. The tension is RISING and Mr. Murdoch is [...]Post from: ColderICE eCommerce Video BlogStupid Is As Stupid Does: Is Rupert Murdoch Stupid? Related posts:The Wednesday WAVE from Google?!? Share this article...Close&#160;Bookmark and Share [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] point. The tension is RISING and Mr. Murdoch is [...]Post from: ColderICE eCommerce Video BlogStupid Is As Stupid Does: Is Rupert Murdoch Stupid? Related posts:The Wednesday WAVE from Google?!? Share this article&#8230;Close&nbsp;Bookmark and Share [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
