Will This Vintage Seller De-Clutter? How I’m Dealing with eBay’s Latest Changes
In John’s recent eBay Price Change Challenge Mythbusters post he remarked in the comments section:
I believe eBay knows that some of those 62 million (Note: Refers to the number of current eBay Store Inventory format listings) will NOT move to core, cause it was the low .03 cents that allowed many to keep them on the site. I think eBay is charging MORE to actually "de-clutter" the system. Raising the price will action make people either SELL the stuff or get it OFF the platform.
Currently I have a Basic eBay Store with about 4,500 items listed on the site. Many hundreds of my items are listed for as little as $5 or less—they’re niche long-tail items you’d be correct in assuming they don’t turn-over very fast.
Will I be de-cluttering?
John’s extracted quote above seems to apply directly to me, however the morning the announcements came down from eBay I ran my numbers through their magic calculator and the results were surprising.
By upgrading my $15.95/month Basic Store to a $49.95/month Premium store and qualifying for the nickel per item insertion fees on Fixed Price listings the calculator claimed I’d knock about $125-$150 per month off of my bill. That’s without changing any of my listing practices.
As with any changes the differences to each of our individual bottom lines are going to vary seller to seller. Extremely so in many cases. The morning I first read of the coming changes I looked them over and was first relieved that they weren’t going to have any obvious negative impact on my business. By the time I ran my numbers through their fee illustrator I went from relieved and non-committal to happy over the changes.
I absolutely understand that just because eBay says it’s a fee decrease and I say my fees are going down that this isn’t necessarily going to save you one red cent. In fact it might be costing you money, I get it. It’s the wide range of businesses and styles of business across eBay which actually makes these changes both so controversial and interesting to discuss.
But bottom line, in my world my bill just went down. In your world the reverse may be true. The key is understanding what just happened and what changes you can apply to continue being profitable, even if that means discontinuing use of eBay altogether.
Towards that end I want to lay out the circumstances of my own eBay business which again, are going to differ greatly from seller to seller. I think these few factors add up to show why these changes work for me:
1) I’ve been listing 800-1,200 Fixed Price items per month under the current fee structure. Those listings, formerly 15 (media) and 35 cents now cost just a nickel, far off-setting the other 3,500 or so items that will cost me just an extra 2 pennies per pop.
2a) Low ASP.
2b) Auctions as usual, which pretty much always start over 99 cents.
With auctions I’ll be paying 10 cents less per listing with most of my Final Value Fees only climbing from the existing 8.75% to the new flat 9% remaining the same because of my store subscription (thanks Karen!).
3) Overall quantity. Having maintained an eBay Store in the past I’ve stocked it over time. If I only listed auctions, the store upgrade would be an expense but necessary in some form to avoid 50c Fixed Price fees. Already having a store I get to upgrade it and actually save by laying out more.
4) Top Rated Seller discounts. I hate to put this one here because nothing’s guaranteed, but I’ve yet to see a negative impact. I understand that this often varies category to category and I seem to be in a good place to benefit from it.
So back to John’s original quote, will I be helping eBay to de-clutter? The obvious answer is no, since I can do what I’m doing and save doing it, however that indicates time standing still. I add listings to the site on a daily basis, they sell much slower, so my current number of items in stock is going to continue to grow over time.
How many nickels can I spend to list a $3 item that might take forever to sell? The answer looks like 60 to break even, but it’s really not. That $3 item listing is an ad, a portal to my other 4,500 listings, so the actual answer is I can afford to pay that nickel until the end of time as long as everything else is moving.
eBay aside, I’ve been working on my own off-eBay shop for some time, and so my plan coming into these changes had been to begin selectively retiring listings from eBay to farm them off to my new store. I consider my vintage goods long-tail items, well, my off-eBay store is going to be the very tip of the tail!
I’ll be pressing forward with this plan, but here’s the best part for me—I don’t have to if I don’t want to … and I can if I want. eBay isn’t dictating this move to me, in other words, I’m facing no pressure from their changes. Believe me, I can recall one eBay fee hike which clamped around my wallet so hard I was forced to immediately cut what were at the time 7,500 store items down to 600—that was several years ago and I’ve been working to up my inventory number ever since!
In the end my own hope for this round of changes is not to save that $125-$150 per month, but to keep my bill right around where it’s always been and use that extra money to list more and sell more. If moving my store items to core works towards that goal then I’d happily pay eBay even more than my current bill in order to increase what I take home in the end.
So John, yes, I am going to de-clutter, but at the same time I’m going to re-clutter my eBay listings.
Related posts:
- Is There a Hidden Fee Increase For eBay Sellers Coming?!?
- eBay Seller Team Offers Answers to Top Rated Seller Questions…Well Sorta?!?
- Why I keep eBay’s Best Offer option manual for my vintage and unique items
- A Vintage Collectables Seller RESPONDS to the ColderICE eBay POST
- Press Release: ChannelAdvisor First to Announce Support For Latest eBay Changes
-
vincej
-
Cliff Aliperti
-
vincej
-
ColderICE
-
tfmurphhk
-
Cliff Aliperti




